![]() On our 75-mph highway loop, the front-drive V-6 Atlas Cross Sport averaged 25 mpg and the turbo four model delivered 26 mpg. The V-6 is thirstier, with ratings of 18 mpg city, 24 mpg highway, and 20 mpg combined for both the front-driver and models with the optional all-wheel-drive system. The four-cylinder Atlas Cross Sport comes with EPA fuel-economy ratings of 21 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, and 23 mpg combined for the front-wheel-drive model and 20, 24, and 22 mpg, respectively, for the all-wheel-drive version. ![]() Tested: 2022 VW Atlas Cross Sport 2.0T R-Line.The ride quality is less refined than expected, too, with the wheels pounding over every imperfection and pothole they cross. ![]() During our test drive, we found the Cross Sport lacks the sporty driving dynamics that its fastback rear end would suggest. That's slightly quicker than a similarly equipped three-row Atlas we tested, but 0.1-second slower than the all-wheel drive model with the turbo four. With the V-6 and front-wheel drive, the Atlas Cross Sport hit 60 mph in 7.5-seconds in our testing. Engine, Transmission, and PerformanceĪ 235-hp turbocharged four-cylinder is standard but a 276-hp 3.6-liter V-6 is available as an option both engines are offered with either a front- or all-wheel drive arrangement. Shoppers who plan on pulling anything with the Atlas Cross Sport will want to get the V-6 Towing package, too. And we'd probably choose the $1900 all-wheel-drive system. We'd also opt for the V-6 over the standard turbocharged four-cylinder. We'd spec the SE model and tack on the optional Technology package, which includes automatic climate control, faux-leather upholstery, passive entry, heated front seats, a power-adjustable driver's seat, and an 8.0-inch touchscreen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |